Evaluation of questionnaire

Evaluation of results and conclusion

General information:

At the beginning and at the end of the week the students had to answer a questionnaire with the same questions so that the evaluation of the questionnaire afterwards would show developments and changes attitudes, knowledges and skills gained by the students during the week.

Students from Germany and Italy did not have any basics of Internet programming as you can see from the results of the questionnaire, so we based the whole week on a basic level, so everyone could learn something from this field. The students from the Czech Republic mostly played the role of more skilled members of the teams (However, there were some Czech students with just some basic knowledge of programming, not so advanced, so they learnt a lot of technical features as well.), so they could help with any trouble concerning coding. However, in teams the strategy was divided as well as subtasks, so everyone could find some interest, mostly in the area of design which could foster anyone to join other fields of programming.

There are values of each questions had to be answered:

Answer

Value

"I totally disagree."

Value 1

"I disagree."

Value 2

"I agree."

Value 3

"I totally agree."

Value 4

In the following questionnaire you can find the average value of answers at the beginning and at the end of the week:

The questionnaire

Attitudes:

1.1. “I think e-commerce is important for my future work life.”

average mark at the beginning of the week: 3,3; average mark at the end of the week: 3,5

1.2. “I think this training course on e-commerce is important for my future work life.”

average mark at the beginning of the week: 3,1; average mark at the end of the week: 3,3

1.3. “I think this special subject of this week is important for my future work life.”

average mark at the beginning of the week: 3,0; average mark at the end of the week: 3,3

1.4. “I see a benefit for me in working on this subject in a team for my personal development.”

average mark at the beginning of the week: 3,3; average mark at the end of the week: 3,7

1.5. “I see a benefit for me in working on this subject.”

average mark at the beginning of the week: 3,2; average mark at the end of the week: 3,6

1.6. “I see a benefit for me in working on this subject in an international team for my personal development.”

average mark at the beginning of the week: 3,4; average mark at the end of the week: 3,8

Interpretation of results:

The students have quite a high awareness of the importance of the theme of the project as well as possibility of skills they can gain. These figures eventually even increased slightly by 0,2 – 0,4 points.

Knowledge:

2.1. ”I have basic knowledge in the field of HTML programming.”

average mark at the beginning of the week: 2,1; average mark at the end of the week: 3,1

2.2. ” I have basic knowledge in the field of CSS programming.”

average mark at the beginning of the week: 1,9; average mark at the end of the week: 2,9

2.3. ”I have basic knowledge in the field of web design.”

average mark at the beginning of the week: 2,2; average mark at the end of the week: 3,4

Interpretation of results:

The students started the week with identifying a lack of knowledge in the field of HTML and CSS. Cooperating on different and (in a certain way) same tasks the students were able to increase their knowledge during the week by 1,0 – 1,2 points which is more than satisfying result working on this subject for just one week.

Skills:

3.1. ” I enjoy working in a team.”

average mark at the beginning of the week: 3,7; average mark at the end of the week: 3,9

3.2. ”I enjoy working in international teams.”

average mark at the beginning of the week: 3,6; average mark at the end of the week: 3,7

3.3. ”I am confident in using English in international teams.”

average mark at the beginning of the week: 3,5; average mark at the end of the week: 3,7

3.4. ”I personally enjoy dealing with this subject.”

average mark at the beginning of the week: 3,1; average mark at the end of the week: 3,5

Interpretation of results:

The students expressed a positive attitude towards soft skills like working in teams and using English language to deal with set tasks which increased slightly during working on the subject by 0,1 – 0,4 points.

Additional questions for evaluation after the course week:

4.1. ”The training material was well structured.”

average mark at the end of the week: 3,5

4.2. ”The training material was useful.”

average mark at the end of the week: 3,6

4.3. ”The training material was useful for working independently on the subject.”

average mark at the end of the week: 3,5

Interpretation of results:

After having attended the training course the students assessed the value of the training material as being very useful and well structured for working independently on this subject.

Final result

5. ”I am satisfied with the outcome of this week.”

average mark at the end of the week: 3,7

Interpretation of results:

In conclusion the students assessed the overall outcome of this week with an average value of 3,7 with 77% of students awarding the project with the highest possible grade.

Evaluation of entrepreneurs

We have gained a very welcomed evaluation by the entrepreneurs who displayed the interest to pass students some subjective feedback which can help them to work even more on their skills and professional approach in general which could be useful for their future career.

Group 1

I would appreciate a bigger gallery. A better logo which would express a bit more the connection with my work.

Text alignment, well-arranged text, a good choice of fonts. Overall, I like the website very much.

Group 2

Errors in the text. The products I offer, I would highlight somehow, not just listing. Maybe, I would change the text alignment. The contact form is too huge for me, at least I would make the letters smaller. The text ‘Write something..’ sounds strange to me and its font is different from others.

A great range of pink, a beautiful background which goes with my work, the shape of the pictures in the gallery is perfect. Contrary to the errors and the changes I would make, I really love it and admire your work.

Group 3

If I should point something out, it might be the text alignment on the first page. I do not quite like the big letters on the page ‘My work’, it scares me off a bit and the allocation of the fields of art using so called hyphen. I do not understand why there is a different font on the page ‘Contact’ in the field ‘Text…’.

Colours and their shades, you have chosen my profile photo very well, the headline on the left with another colour of the first letters is an amazing idea, it looks fabulous. The best web about me, I think. The charming background goes totally with my personality and my profile photo. The colour of the text, well-chosen gallery, perfect font of the motto. Even though I have mentioned some points I do not totally like, it’s just wonderful, thank you. I want to use this website. 😊

Group 4

The shaded font bothers me, because I can read it with a difficulty. Grammar mistakes in the text. On the page ‘My work’ there are suddenly bullets, I would rather have the same style of the text on every page.

Perfect background, I love the green grass, because it expresses what I do. Simplicity is the best. Finally, the widest range of my products in the gallery. I like the icons, surprisingly. Out of spite the minuses, I am fond of this website.

Group 5

Grammar mistakes in the text. I do not like different fonts and the error with capital letters on the page ‘Contact’, that would be probably the weakest point of the whole page.

The page ‘Products’ is absolutely stunning. The choice of colours is perfect. The thing that the upper part with my name and motto is visible on every page is the best. Despite of the negative points, the page is totally wonderful.

Group 6

My first name on the main page is hidden because of the colours. I am not fond of the huge letters of the text, it’s too much, I think. At the bottom of the page there should be, as it says, the logo of Erasmus+, but it is not readable. In the field of ‘Subject’ the phrase ‘Write something..’ sounds strange to me. I would rather change the font of the text.

Amazing colours, the logo – the leaf in the logo, which represents the nature, is a great idea that expresses my passion. I really like the font of the headlines/ categories. I would use the exact same if I wanted to create my own website. The charming background goes perfectly with my profile photo. I love the way the website looks overall. It’s marvellous.

Group 7

I strongly do not like changing of fonts, even some capital letters are misused. The buttons like ‘Back’ or ‘Route’ are too dark because of the colours, I would change them, f.e. the letters could be white and then the frame would be red. There is a perfect idea to put there the route which refers to google maps, but not with my place of living. Instead of Kostelec nad Orlici, there is Dobruska. Too big mistakes; it’s a shame because in other ways it’s a cool work.

You have a perfect idea of combination of the colours – red, white and black. The layout of the website is great, how it is divided into categories. You have made up some facts about me, but actually, you have captured my true essence. What looks really cool, is the layout of two - three columns. The website looks very sophisticated, it has impressed me a lot, how much effort you have put into your work. You have done a great job!

Group 8

There are some sentences which sounds a little strange to me. If we should stick to the tasks, it also says, there should be ‘Copyright’ or ‘All rights reserved’ with authors’ names, which I miss there. What I would definitely change is the text alignment.

I love the pictures, the colours, the fonts. It looks unbelievable, in the positive way, of course. The perfect thing you have done is the ‘picture – text’/ ‘text – picture’ layout, it is stunning. You made an excellent collage of my work which you put as the background to the motto. I just love it, especially the simplicity, despite any negative remarks.

Group 9

Offered changes: the text alignment and a better choice of font and the size of letters, even pictures. The gallery looks a bit poor using the size of the pictures. I would not like people creating any ‘Accounts’ on my page and write there any information about themselves. Even though I like simplicity, this website is too simple for me.

I like the colours and the layout is not bad – it’s fine that it’s somehow tabular. I would put a bigger effort into creating a website next time. Anyway, this is a good start and thank you for that.

Group 10

Not visible authors of the website. Changing fonts which is alogical, and also the colours of the text and headlines, I do not quite like. I would definitely change the text alignment.

Thank you for such a wide gallery of my work. I absolutely love the idea when you click on my piece of work and it opens with others separately, not on the webpage. I like grey and white layout. You have chosen a great profile photo of me. After some technical changes, I would totally like to use this website officially.

Last updated